Connecting metrics for shape-texture knowledge in computer vision
See where this sits in the topic map →Summary AI-generated
- TL;DR
- Modern artificial neural networks excel at computer vision tasks like object recognition, yet their underlying behavior differs significantly from the human visual system.
- Problem
- Deep neural networks remain brittle and susceptible to image changes that humans easily handle, largely because humans classify objects by shape while networks rely mostly on texture.
- Method
- This work extends previous analyses to a much larger set of deep neural network architectures to better understand how these systems use shape and texture features.
- Results
- The study found that image classification performance is highly correlated with shape bias at the output and penultimate layers, and that neurons representing shape and texture are strongly anti-correlated, suggesting feature competition.
- Contributions
- Advancing the state of the art in understanding the shape-texture phenomenon by analyzing a significantly broader range of deep neural network architectures.
- Limitations
- Not specified in the abstract.
- Takeaways
- While a general correlation exists between model performance and shape bias, notable variations remain across different architecture families.
- Applications
- Not specified in the abstract.
- Topics
- Computer Vision, Deep Learning, Neural Network Architectures, Shape-Texture Bias
- For industry
- Not specified in the abstract.
- Why it matters
- Exploring this question may lead to better-performing neural network architectures and a deeper understanding of the primate visual system.
Abstract
Modern artificial neural networks, including convolutional neural networks and vision transformers, have mastered several computer vision tasks, including object recognition. However, there are many significant differences between the behavior and robustness of these systems and of the human visual system. Deep neural networks remain brittle and susceptible to many changes in the image that do not cause humans to misclassify images. Part of this different behavior may be explained by the type of features humans and deep neural networks use in vision tasks. Humans tend to classify objects according to their shape while deep neural networks seem to rely mostly on texture. Exploring this question is relevant, since it may lead to better performing neural network architectures and to a better understanding of the workings of the vision system of primates. In this work, we advance the state of the art in our understanding of this phenomenon, by extending previous analyses to a much larger set of deep neural network architectures. We found that the performance of models in image classification tasks is highly correlated with their shape bias measured at the output and penultimate layer. Furthermore, our results showed that the number of neurons that represent shape and texture are strongly anti-correlated, thus providing evidence that there is competition between these two types of features. Finally, we observed that while in general there is a correlation between performance and shape bias, there are significant variations between architecture families.